I was looking forward to Rango for several reasons:
1. Johnny Depp. Yes, he's a bit overrated, but I find him entertaining. (Although, that is no excuse for a fourth Pirates when the second one wasn't even good.)
2. I knew they used an interesting new kind of animation. Something about emotion capture. I don't really remember.
3. It had 89% on Rotten Tomatoes, which I tend to follow blindly. Specifically, Roger Ebert loved it, and I also tend to agree with him.
My end opinion:
1. Yes, Johnny Depp was entertaining. And his little chameleon character was super cute.
2. The animation was fascinating and there was something new and different about it, though I can't quite put my finger on what that was exactly.
3. It turns out I can disagree with 89% of the movie critics out there - even my beloved Ebert. I was constantly aware of the time and bored to bits with this slow film. I know I missed out on some inside jokes because I've only seen a handful of Westerns, and the majority of the critics mentioned being impressed with all of the Western parodies. The problem is that I loathe Westerns. I find them dismal and hopeless and devoid of humor. (True Grit being a notable exception - loved that.)
The good news is that the theater served a delicious chocolate raspberry cake that almost held my attention long enough to call it an enjoyable experience.
I give Rango two claws down, Lobsters. And I give Hampton CineBistro two claws up!
No comments:
Post a Comment